For those conservatives fully aware of how the First Amendment works and who still call for government action against Facebook, I just say: Cut it out. The solution for conservatives’ concerns about social media platforms is to vote with your feet and use a different platform. Stick to your principles and forget about the temporary insanity of arguing to expand government regulation.
Conservatives value a strict adherence to principles because of what can happen when a society drifts from its core values. It’s crucial they remember these principles in the age of the internet.
As President Ronald Reagan said, “Government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.”
Government regulation of free speech online would not safeguard the future of conservative speech. It would endanger it.
If a business decides to favor your point of view, you would likely see that as a good thing and spend more time on that platform. Conversely, you would be less likely to spend time on the opposing platform. But at the end of the day, businesses must be allowed to do as they see fit. And as users, if we don’t like something, we can simply go somewhere else, allowing the market to pick winners and losers.
Before today, we’ve never selected a state’s entire legislative agenda as the top item on our iAWFUL list of bad Internet laws, because no single state had ever made such a concerted effort to regulate, restrict and repress e-commerce.
California has always had a reputation for being pioneering.
Over the past six months, the Sacramento statehouse has unleashed a torrent of misguided, regressive bills targeted at the heart of the innovation industry that is at the heart of the economic recovery – not only in California, but across the nation.
Individually, none of these bills poses as much threat as the second item on our list – the federal Internet sales tax that topped the last iAWFUL – but taken together they not only represent a disturbing new trend of regulatory interventionism, but also a serious threat to the Internet economy. Read more
On Monday, the Wall Street Journal pulled the ostrich’s head out of the sand. They reported that Facebook is considering whether and how to accommodate users under the age of 13. It’s generating a flurry of coverage, but is anyone truly surprised?
Several independent surveys have concluded that not only are children under the age of 13 using Facebook, but that their parents are helping them do it — by lying about their date of birth when setting-up an account.
Of course this isn’t unique to Facebook. How many pre-teens have faked their age to get a gmail account, or to view movie and video game trailers? Kids are always going places where they’re not allowed and in all honestly, we’ve been here before… Read more
Privacy zealots have a big problem.
In order to get what they want, they need people to be afraid, but gulf between their Chicken-Little claims and the actual experiences of most Internet users grows wider by the day.
Their latest effort to salvage their ever-diminishing credibility comes in response to a seemingly innocuous Consumer Reports survey on the Facebook habits of American consumers. Read more
Today, my family decided to drive 300 miles to visit my parents for the holidays. We selected snacks for the road, chose a route, and set the cruise control at 65 (wishful thinking, given all the traffic coming out of Washington).
Sure, there were risks to with my decision – whining kids, car trouble, aggressive drivers – but it was worth it.
As I was relaxing after the drive I opened Facebook – an app I decided to put on my tablet – and was surprised to see an article recommended by WSJ Social, an app that I also chose to download from the Wall Street Journal.
The Journal article tells me what happens if I install an app and agree to give it access to the info it requests: (ready?) The app can then access that info about me and my Facebook friends. Read more
Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) delivered a speech in the Senate today that flamed Facebook for complying with the tax code, and suggested that if only tax laws were changed then the government would have the money to “pay for programs to protect our seniors and veterans, put cops on the beat, or teachers in classrooms.”
Talk about raining on the parade!
We get that Senator Levin has a thing against corporations getting favorable treatment under the tax laws. Unless of course the tax benefits specifically help his state’s ailing auto industry.
Today’s speech was a platform for the Senator’s legislation that would forbid companies from booking the cost of employee stock grants differently than the cost they deduct for income tax purposes following an IPO.
It’s sad to see our Senate making it a priority to maximize the government’s take from one of the only functioning economic engines left in the country. Never mind that Facebook owner-employees – and the myriad spin-off ventures spawned by this 8 year old enterprise – are set to drop billions of dollars into federal and state tax coffers.
There is no doubt that our tax system is confusing and contorted, but this practice of picking winners in one industry and choosing losers in another is exactly what got us into this mess. Instead of piecemeal changes that target the golden goose, Senator Levin should focus on fundamental tax reform that will benefit all businesses.
Because good news is so rarely reported, here’s a headline you probably won’t see today: Social Network Funds Grants to Protect Kids Online.
Then again, it’s possible that some reporters will spin that into bad news to make for a flashy headline. For example, last November PEW came out with research on teens’ use of social networks. The Washington Post led its story with, “There’s something about the Internet that can bring out the meanness in teenagers.”
While PEW found that 9 of 10 teens have witnessed bullying online, it went on to report that teens encounter far more bullying in-person and in texting than on social networks. PEW also found many positive benefits to teens’ use of social networks, including the finding that 80% of teens have defended a victim of online bullying. Read more