POLITICO - Morning Tax: Getting on the same page

Those opposed to giving states more power to collect from out-of-state retailers said they’re gearing up for a potential date with the U.S. Supreme Court. “We will be ready to show that the perspective of these three large online retail defendants is only a small part of the story,” said Steve DelBianco of NetChoice, referring to Newegg, Overstock and Wayfair.

READ MORE

The Consumerist - Why You Should Care About South Dakota’s Controversial Online Sales Tax Law

Shortly after the law was passed, the state asked a judge to proactively declare that retailers must comply with the law. Coming at it from the other side, the American Catalog Mailers Association and NetChoice, an online retail trade group sued to block the law from being enforced, as did online retailers NewEgg, Overstock.com, and Wayfair.

READ MORE

eCommerce Bytes - New Developments in Online Sales Tax Debate

Some like NetChoice point to the fact states have a way to collect taxes on purchases made by residents from out-of-state retailers – they require their own citizens to pay “use” tax for transactions in which out-of-state retailers don’t collect the “sales” tax. 

NetChoice is a trade association of ecommerce businesses and writes on its website, “most states have done little to educate consumers about their use tax obligation or to provide them with an easy mechanism for compliance. This suggests there may not be enough revenue involved for the states to invest time and resources in its recovery.”

NetChoice Executive Director Steve DelBianco said of today’s developments:

“This ruling gives the state what it wanted all along – a case they could appeal to the US Supreme Court. If the high court takes this case, we will be ready to show that the perspective of a few large online retail defendants is only a small part of the story. In fact, many thousands of smaller businesses would bear disproportionate burdens and costs if they are forced to become tax collectors for 12,000 jurisdictions across 46 states.”

READ MORE

BNA Bloomberg - South Dakota Supreme Court Strikes Digital Sales Tax Statute

Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice, a Washington, D.C.-based internet commerce trade association, told Bloomberg BNA that if the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the case, NetChoice would be quick to back up smaller remote retailers, who DelBianco argues would be harmed the most if Quill was overturned.

“If the high court takes this case, we will be ready to show that the perspective of the three large online retail defendants is only a small part of the story, since many thousands of smaller businesses would bear disproportionate burdens and costs if they are forced to become tax collectors for 12,000 jurisdictions across 46 states,” DelBianco said.

READ MORE

BNA Bloomberg - Massachusetts Sets ‘Cookie’ Tax Regulation Without Delay

A representative from Washington, D.C.-based NetChoice, which sued the DOR over Directive 17-1, attended the public hearing but didn’t comment.

READ MORE

Business Advocate - Massachusetts: Department of Revenue proceeds with proposed nexus regulation

On the other hand, entities representing internet sellers, like Netchoice and the American Catalog Mailers Association (ACMA), oppose remote nexus laws like this one.

READ MORE

Associated Press - Indiana files lawsuit to defend out-of-state sales tax law

The lawsuit is in response to another lawsuit the American Catalog Mailers Association and NetChoice filed in June challenging the state’s new sales tax law and its implementation. It aims to level the playing field between Indiana businesses and out-of-state businesses that sell products online.

READ MORE

Eagle Country Online - Indiana Files Lawsuit Hoping To Reverse Supreme Court On Online Sales Taxes

It is the state’s response to a June lawsuit against the state filed by American Catalog Mailers Association and NetChoice seeking to stop implementation of HEA 1129.

READ MORE

BNA Bloomberg - Wayfair, Overstock Dragged Into Indiana Online Tax Fight

Washington-based NetChoice, one of the associations bringing the Indiana lawsuit, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. The other party, the Washington-based American Catalog Mailers Association, declined to comment. The ACMA, like NetChoice, is entangled in the other pending lawsuits as well.

Steve DelBianco, executive director of NetChoice previously told Bloomberg BNA that he was “confident that the court would grant an injunction barring enforcement of the Indiana law, just as a South Dakota court did in March by invalidating a nearly identical law there.”

READ MORE

The Berkshire Eagle - Doomed plan to tax online retailers

NetChoice — a national trade association representing e-commerce sites — joined forces in a lawsuit to challenge the proposal with the American Catalog Mailers Association, a trade association representing the interests of companies, individuals and organizations engaged in and supporting catalog marketing.

NetChoice Executive Director Steve DelBianco has warned that his association will not hesitate to refile the lawsuit if the administration moves forward with a similar regulation.

READ MORE