NetChoice Opposition to Montana HB 645 - Concerns about overregulating the use of Biometrics

NetChoice Opposition to Montana HB 645 – Concerns about overregulating the use of Biometrics

Industry Coalition Opposes State Tracking Software Mandates Over Privacy and Security Concerns

NetChoice Comments for the Record for United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce of the Committee on Energy and Commerce hearing on “Protecting Consumer Privacy in The Era of Big Data”

NetChoice Comments in Advance of House and Senate Privacy Hearings

Below is NetChoice’s statement in advance of tomorrow’s privacy hearing in the House, and Wednesday’s privacy hearing in the Senate. Here are NetChoice’s comments for the record for the House Hearing on consumer privacy.

“We are seeing a fracturing of the internet driven by states introducing disparate privacy bills.” said Carl Szabo, Vice President of NetChoice. “The time has come for establishment of a nationwide standard for privacy online.”

“Americans should ask for a better privacy approach than what Europe and California concocted. Americans deserve a privacy law that doesn’t remove services and stymie innovation.” continued Szabo. “Federal privacy legislation should allow for industry safe-harbors similar to those in the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act.”

NetChoice Comments to Wyoming: Unconstitutional Issues of SF 76 – Warrants for digital records

NetChoice Testimony to New Hampshire Legislature

NetChoice Testimony to New Hampshire Legislature on Biometrics

 

NetChoice Response to FTC Request for Comments on The State of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law and Enforcement, and Their Development, Since the Pitofsky Hearings

NetChoice Response to FTC Request for Comments on The State of Antitrust and Consumer Protection Law and Enforcement, and Their Development, Since the Pitofsky Hearings