Digital Commerce 360 - The online sales tax debate has its day in the US Supreme Court

Steve DelBianco, executive director at e-commerce advocacy group NetChoice, agrees, noting that the justices asked questions about what happens if the tax software breaks, the costs for smaller businesses to collect for 46 states and if nearly all major e-commerce companies collect sales tax, hasn’t the problem already peaked.

“Tough questions asked by the justices today reveal that the court understands this is far more complicated than South Dakota has claimed,” DelBianco says. “Overturning Quill isn’t just flipping off a switch. It would cause national chaos.”

Axios - Supreme Court grapples with the online sales tax

A state-by-state sales tax system could force small sellers to rely on large online retail platforms like Amazon, Etsy and eBay who have the infrastructure to deal with the complexity, said Steve DelBianco, President and CEO of NetChoice, an e-commerce trade association.

Retail Dive - What's at stake in the e-commerce sales tax debate

“Think about the chaos that would ensue if in fact Quill were to disappear. It is not just 12,000 state and local jurisdictions. There’s also 550 Indian tribes who would assert any business anywhere in the country owes them sales tax for sales made to resident of that jurisdiction.” – Steve DelBianco, NetChoice, Executive Director

Norwalk Reflector - Supreme Court considers whether states should have power to tax all online sales

NetChoice, in a letter to Nebraska senators, cautioned that the bill would “violate the privacy expectations of Nebraska citizens … the state would know they are buying from vendors whose names reveal sensitive private information, such as medical conditions, financial problems, sexual preferences, and political beliefs.”

CNBC Opinion - The Supreme Court should not reverse internet sales tax law

Also in:

Top Breaking News

Op-ed by Steve DelBianco, President of NetChoice:

There’s no doubt that our current physical presence protection standard has enabled billions of dollars of economic growth. Time and again, Quill and the ITFA have stood up to legal and legislative challenges that threatened the digital economy.

The Supreme Court should recognize this on Tuesday, and leave our vibrant e-commerce ecosystem intact, while leaving it to Congress to make our nation’s laws.

 

Law 360 - Nixing Physical Presence Tax Rule Violates ITFA, Officials Say

DelBianco also said the ITFA issue could well come up in oral arguments if the solicitor general, who
will take 10 minutes on behalf of the state, repeats his reasoning that the court need not overturn
Quill but can simply exempt internet commerce from the physical presence requirement.

“If they do that they are going to run smack into the ITFA, and the defendants’ lawyers are going to
have a response to that,” DelBianco said. “That’s imposing a burden on internet retailers that is not
on catalog and other remote retailers.”

Facebook and Cambridge Analytica: What’s this really about?

So rather than blame technology for election outcomes and call for more regulation, let’s start by seeing this incident for what it is: a university researcher who breached his contract has made it harder for anyone to ever again do good work using data from Facebook public profiles.

Politico - Morning Tax: What's going on in the states?

A separate brief from NetChoice argues that brushing aside the current precedent would violate the Internet Tax Freedom Act, though some experts are quite skeptical of that case.

Midland Paper - ACMA Files Amicus Brief in South Dakota v. Wayfair Supreme Court Case; Asks Court to Upheld Quill Precedent

In January the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Dakota. Following the hearing, the high court is expected to render its decision by the end of the current term in June. Along with its coalition partner organization NetChoice, the ACMA will host a press conference immediately following the April 17th hearing on the Supreme Court steps.

Media Corporations Want to Control Your Newsfeed

We now live in a golden age of information and news, but if you talk to the big media companies, they see access to other content as a direct threat to their profits. These big newspapers want to return us to the dark age of information where they have the power to control the news that you see and drive-up their profits… Read more