Close this menu

Digital Parenting

NetChoice Wins: Court Declares Arkansas Age Verification Law UNCONSTITUTIONAL, Permanently Halts It to Protect Arkansans’ Rights & Privacy Online

The Court clearly states: “If the legislature’s goal in passing Act 689 was to protect minors from materials or interactions that could harm them online, there is no evidence that the Act […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Texas SB 2420

NetChoice asked the Senate State Affairs Committee to oppose SB 2420, which would require app stores to verify users’ ages and obtain parental consent for minors’ downloads and purchases, while […]

NetChoice Letter on Why the Virginia General Assembly Should Not Enact SB 854 – With or Without the Governor’s Amendments

NetChoice urged Virginia’s General Assembly to reject Senate Bill 854 – with or without Governor Youngkin’s proposed amendments. As the Supreme Court recognized last year in its NetChoice opinion, the […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to North Carolina HB 301

HB 301 imposes age-verification and parental consent requirements for minors accessing certain online content, despite courts consistently ruling such requirements unconstitutional. The bill presents privacy concerns that undermine the state’s […]

NetChoice, CCIA Refile Case to Stop I.D. for the Internet and Keep Free Speech Accessible in Florida

TALLAHASSEE, Fla.—Today, NetChoice refiled its lawsuit with the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) to halt Florida’s law mandating an I.D. for the internet, violating free speech rights and putting […]

Congress Can Enhance Online Safety By Funding Law Enforcement, Passing a National Privacy Standard

WASHINGTON—Today, a U.S. House Energy and Commerce subcommittee will hold a hearing on what actions Congress can take to combat harms against Americans online.  NetChoice applauds the subcommittee for wanting […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Nevada SB 63

While well-intentioned, SB 63 imposes unconstitutional age-verification and parental consent requirements on Nevadans. Age-verification and parental consent also presents heightened threats to privacy and undermines the government’s interest in protecting […]

NetChoice Sues Louisiana to Protect Free Speech, Online Safety & Parental Rights

BATON ROUGE, La.—Today, NetChoice sued Louisiana to stop SB 162, a new law that forces citizens to surrender private information to access protected speech online—violating the First Amendment and putting […]

NetChoice v. Murrill (Louisiana)

NetChoice sued Louisiana to stop SB 162, a law forcing Louisianans to surrender private information to access protected speech online—violating the First Amendment and putting their data at risk.  The […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Florida SB 1438

SB 1438 requires device manufacturers, operating systems, and app stores to implement age verification systems. If enacted, this bill would almost certainly violate Floridian’s First Amendment rights, weaken their privacy, […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Maine HP 530

HP 530 would ban social media for those under 14, require all users of social media to verify their ages, and prohibit young people from accessing social media without verifiable […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Texas HB 499

HB 499 would mandate warning labels for constitutionally protected speech posted on online platforms. While well-intentioned, the legislation presents significant policy and legal concerns.

NetChoice, CCIA to Fight Ruling in Florida Case

TALLAHASSEE, Fla.—Last week, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida dismissed our case with the Computer & Communications Industry Association against HB 3, Florida’s ID for the […]

Third Time Still Not a Charm: Court Rules Against California Online Speech Code Again in NetChoice v. Bonta

SAN JOSE, Calif.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California again granted NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction in its entirety against California’s Speech Code, misleadingly branded […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to Idaho SB 1158

SB 1158 places unfair burdens on manufacturers who cannot guarantee perfect filtering yet face substantial liability. The bill, while well-intentioned, raises significant First Amendment concerns and would create a false […]

TODAY: NetChoice Hearing to Permanently Strike Down Ohio Law Harming Families, Data Security & Speech Online

COLUMBUS, Ohio—Today, NetChoice has a hearing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, where we will be asking the court to permanently halt Ohio’s Parental Notification […]

A Better Path to Protecting Children Online: Congress Should Invest in Law Enforcement, Not Censorship

WASHINGTON—Today, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism is holding a hearing to examine the Strengthening Transparency and Obligation to Protect Children Suffering from Abuse and Mistreatment Act (STOP […]

NetChoice Testimony in Opposition to AL SB 186, Device Filters

Alabama SB 186 mandates that manufacturers include a built-in content filter on all devices activated in the state, which must automatically be set to “on” for users identified as minors […]

NetChoice Letter Urging Virginia Gov. Youngkin to Veto Senate Bill 854

We strongly urge Governor Youngkin to veto Senate Bill 854, which presents significant First Amendment concerns. SB 854 rations access to protected speech for minors by limiting their ability to […]