As lawmakers around the country seek to expand government control of the internet, NetChoice has taken several states to court over new unconstitutional laws on online speech and business. NetChoice's Litigation Center works to ensure the rights of Americans and our world-leading tech industry are defended in the courts.
FAYETTEVILLE, Ark.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas issued a preliminary injunction in NetChoice’s lawsuit against Arkansas Act 900, a cosmetic attempt by the…
Learn MoreMINNEAPOLIS, Minn.—Today, NetChoice sued Minnesota for the second time over the government’s latest attack on websites that host free speech. NetChoice v. Ellison (2026) seeks to stop HF 2,…
Learn MoreBALTIMORE—Today, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland issued a final judgment, ruling the censorship provision of Maryland’s digital advertising tax law was unconstitutional and…
Learn MoreWASHINGTON—Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of NetChoice & CCIA’s core First Amendment arguments against Texas and Florida’s unconstitutional laws controlling online speech,…
Learn MoreThe Court clearly states: “If the legislature’s goal in passing Act 689 was to protect minors from materials or interactions that could harm them online, there is no evidence that the Act will…
Learn MoreCONTACT: PRESS@NETCHOICE.ORGCOLUMBUS, Ohio—Today, a U.S. District Court in NetChoice v. Yost permanently struck down Ohio’s age verification law, which conditioned all Ohioans’ ability to…
Learn MoreNetChoice filed an amicus brief supporting X and Rumble’s challenge to California’s political speech censorship law, AB 2655, in Babylon Bee v. Bonta.
The brief argues that Section 230 preempts…
Learn MoreALEXANDRIA, Va.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction, halting the enforcement of SB 854.This ruling…
Learn More
