Close this menu

NetChoice v. Fitch (Mississippi)

Key Takeaways:
  • State lawmakers in Mississippi have unfortunately followed the path of some other states in violating their citizens’ constitutionally-protected rights, endangering their online privacy and security, and thwarting their rights to parent their individual households as they deem appropriate.
  • We sued Mississippi to keep online communication safe and free and to ensure parents—not big government—are in the driver's seat of their families.
What's At Stake
  • HB 1126 violates the First Amendment because it conditions Mississippians’ access to vast amounts of protected speech on handing over their sensitive, personal data. 
  • It jeopardizes the security of all users, especially minors, by requiring them to surrender sensitive, personal information and creates a new target for hackers and predators to exploit.
  • Parents and guardians are best situated to control their family’s online presence. HB 1126 usurps the parental role and seizes it for the State.  
  • A vast amount of speech could be unintentionally censored online under the vague requirements of the government under the law, including: The U.S. Declaration of Independence, Sherlock Holmes, The Goonies, the National Treasure movie series featuring Nicholas Cage, Taylor Swift’s new album, and much more. 
Case Brief

Case Status: Hearing on Mississippi's Appeal of NetChoice Preliminary Injunction

Latest Update: February 3, 2026

Attorneys:

  • Steve Lehotsky
  • Scott Keller
  • Jeremy Evan Maltz
  • Jared Magnuson
  • Josh Morrow


Firms:
Lehotsky Keller Cohn

Timeline
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
    June 7, 2024: NetChoice files complaint and request for preliminary injunction against HB1126
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
    July 1, 2024: District Court grants NetChoice's request for preliminary injunction
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    September 26, 2024: NetChoice files response brief to the State's appeal to the 5th Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    April 17, 2025: Fifth Circuit remands injunction to District Court
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
    May 5, 2025: NetChoice files updated complaint and request for a preliminary injunction/temporary restraining order
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi
    June 18, 2025: District Court again grants NetChoice's request for preliminary injunction
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    July 17, 2025: Fifth Circuit grants Mississippi's request to stay NetChoice's preliminary injunction
  • U.S. Supreme Court
    July 21, 2025: NetChoice files emergency appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court
  • U.S. Supreme Court
    August 14, 2025: Supreme Court denies NetChoice emergency appeal on preliminary injunction
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    February 3, 2026: Hearing on Mississippi's Appeal of NetChoice Preliminary Injunction

NetChoice sued Mississippi over its HB 1126 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi to keep online communications and speech safe and free, as well as to ensure parents—not big government—are in the driver’s seat of their families.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit lifted NetChoice’s preliminary injunction in an unreasoned, one-line order on July 17, 2025. NetChoice filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court on July 21, 2025, urging the justices to reinstate our preliminary injunction against this I.D.-for-Speech law.

The U.S. Supreme Court unfortunately denied NetChoice’s emergency application on August 14, 2025, but NetChoice remains confident we will succeed at ultimately striking down Mississippi’s law. As Justice Kavanaugh writes in his concurrence:

“To be clear, NetChoice has, in my view, demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits—namely, that enforcement of the Mississippi law would likely violate its members’ First Amendment rights under this Court’s precedents…In short, under this Court’s case law as it currently stands, the Mississippi law is likely unconstitutional.”

While well-intentioned, HB 1126 is an unconstitutional overreach into citizens’ rights that courts will likely block. As NetChoice has seen in other states, mandating age verification and parental consent for digital services violates privacy and stifles the free exchange of ideas. Mississippi requires websites to block broad protected speech categories, forcing online businesses to censor speech broadly with vague, unclear compliance standards. 

Further, by forcing all websites to identify users, every digital service in Mississippi will need to collect more data and information on their users, including children. 

This law also contains a unique provision with broad content moderation parameters that may result in the censorship of vast amounts of speech online. If the law goes into effect, some examples could include: The U.S. Declaration of Independence, Sherlock Holmes, The Goonies, the movie series starring Nicholas Cage, National Treasure, Taylor Swift’s new album and much more.

Parents and guardians, not politicians, should be in charge of their children’s online experience.

Read NetChoice’s initial complaint, filed June 7, 2024, here.

Our Team

Chris Marchese – Co-Director of the NetChoice Litigation Center

Link to bio

Paul Taske – Co-Director of the NetChoice Litigation Center

Link to Bio

NetChoice Complaint, filed June 7, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

NetChoice filed its First Amended Complaint on May 2, 2025, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

On July 1, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi granted NetChoice a preliminary injunction against HB 1126.

NetChoice Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed June 7, 2024, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.

Mississippi filed its Brief in Opposition to NetChoice’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction on June 18, 2024

NetChoice filed its Reply Brief supporting the Motion for Preliminary Injunction on June 21, 2024.

In July 2024, Mississippi appealed the District Court’s ruling granting NetChoice a preliminary injunction against HB 1126 to the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

On August 27, 2024, Mississippi filed its opening brief.

On September 26, 2024, NetChoice filed a brief opposing Mississippi’s appeal.

On October 17, 2024, Mississippi filed its reply brief.

On April 17, 2025, the Fifth Circuit issued a decision vacating the preliminary injunction and remanding the case to the district court to apply the facial standard.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi again granted NetChoice a preliminary injunction on June 18, 2025.

NetChoice filed a renewed motion for preliminary injunction and motion for temporary restraining order on May 5, 2025.

  • Memo supporting motion.

Mississippi filed its opposition to the renewed preliminary injunction motion on May 19, 2025.

NetChoice filed its reply brief on on May 23, 2025.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted Mississippi’s request to stay NetChoice’s preliminary injunction on July 17, 2025.

The State of Mississippi again appealed NetChoice’s preliminary injunction from the U.S. District Court.

The U.S. Supreme Court unfortunately denied NetChoice’s emergency application on August 14, 2025, but NetChoice remains confident we will succeed at ultimately striking down Mississippi’s law.

NetChoice filed an emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court on July 21, 2025, urging the justices to reinstate our preliminary injunction.