Close this menu

NetChoice v. Griffin (Arkansas)

Key Takeaways:
  • On March 31, 2025, the U.S. District Court ruled for NetChoice that the law is indeed unconstitutional and permanently blocked Act 689 from being enforced.
  • AR’s SB 396 violates the First Amendment by mandating that leading websites collect and verify sensitive personal information about their users to allow them access to digital communication tools.
What's At Stake
  • Arkansans’ First Amendment rights are under threat from the government forcing them to provide sensitive information to websites to view them.
  • SB 396 risks the leaking of sensitive information, like photos of driving licenses, by forcing websites to collect and process this information.
  • The law puts the government in charge of how young people use the internet, rather than families and parents.
  • It also burdens all Arkansans with sharing personal information to be able to use online services regardless of their age.
Case Brief

Case Status: U.S. District Court ruled for NetChoice, declared the law unconstitutional, and permanently blocked Act 689 from being enforced.

Latest Update: March 31, 2025

Attorneys:

  • Paul Clement
  • Erin Murphy
  • James Xi
  • Joseph DeMott


Firms:
Clement Murphy

Timeline
  • District Court
    6/29/2023 NetChoice Files Initial Complaint
  • District Court
    7/7/2023 NetChoice Files Request for Preliminary Injunction
  • District Court
    8/15/2023 Preliminary Injunction Hearing in U.S. District Court
  • District Court
    8/31/2023 Preliminary Injunction Request Granted
  • District Court
    3/31/2025 Permanent Injunction Granted to Stop Act 689

On March 31, 2025, a U.S. District Court declared Arkansas Act 689 UNCONSTITUTIONAL and permanently blocked the law from enforcement to keep lawful, protected communication safe and free online in NetChoice v. Griffin.

The state of Arkansas undermined the First Amendment in passing SB 396 in 2023. The law mandated that leading websites verify the identity and age of users. Our lawsuit against Attorney General Griffin over SB 396 protected the First Amendment and keep online communication safe.

The law undermined the First Amendment by requiring that Arkansans hand over sensitive and private information to be able to use digital communication services. Hinging access to social media and other sources of important information on uploading personal information will harm free speech.

SB 396 also undermined cybersecurity by requiring residents to hand over, and requiring websites to process, sensitive personal information that is highly valuable to bad actors like organized crime groups and online hackers.

Rather than empower families to lead in the cultural debate over how children and young people use tech, Arkansas decided that it can use the power of the government to make decisions in the place of the state’s parents. The Court disagreed and permanently halted the law.

Additionally, SB 396 violated the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. constitution by conflicting with federal laws to protect children online, and violated the Commerce Clause by regulating the internet outside of the state’s borders.

Read NetChoice’s original complaint, filed June 29, 2023, here.

Our Team

Chris Marchese – Director of Litigation

Link to bio

Paul Taske – Associate Director of Litigation

Link to Bio

Court Filings

The Western District of Arkansas, Fayetteville Division, issued its decision on August 31, 2023, granting NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction.

Court Documents Associated with the Preliminary Injunction Request:

Filings in Support of Our Motion for a Preliminary Injunction

On March 31, 2025, the U.S. District Court ruled for NetChoice that the law is indeed unconstitutional and permanently blocked Act 689 from being enforced.

On November 28, 2023, NetChoice filed a Motion for Summary Judgment to the U.S. District Court in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

On June 21, 2024, NetChoice filed an Amended Motion for Summary Judgment to the U.S. District Court in Fayetteville, Arkansas.