Close this menu

NetChoice Cases

NetChoice v. Ellison (Minnesota)

Minnesota’s SF 4097 is a clear attempt to pressure social media companies into curating and delivering speech in line with government preferences—a direct violation of the First Amendment. The law […]

NetChoice v. Griffin (Arkansas, 2025)

In March 2025, the Arkansas government lost to NetChoice in court for the clear censorship problems with its online ID-for-speech law. Instead of finding solutions that actually would help families […]

NetChoice v. Carr (Georgia SB 351)

Georgia SB 351 unconstitutionally restricts online free speech, compromises cybersecurity and undermines parental authority. By requiring identity verification for access to digital services, it violates First Amendment rights, as courts […]

NetChoice v. Bonta (California INFORM Act)

NetChoice filed its third lawsuit against California, this time, targeting SB 1144, an unconstitutional attempt to regulate online marketplaces. This misguided law threatens to burden websites with red tape that […]

NetChoice v. Murrill (Louisiana)

NetChoice sued Louisiana to stop SB 162, a law forcing Louisianans to surrender private information to access protected speech online—violating the First Amendment and putting their data at risk.  The […]

NetChoice v. Brown (Maryland)

The Maryland Speech Code puts the government in charge of what information residents can access online, forcing websites to police speech and violating the First Amendment. Beyond censorship, the law […]

TechNet & NetChoice v. CFPB

NetChoice and TechNet filed to voluntarily dismiss this case on May 20, 2025, after Congress and President Trump invalidated the misguided and unlawful Biden-era rule, “Defining Larger Participants of a […]

NetChoice v. Bonta (California SB 976)

NetChoice sued California on November 12, 2024, over a law passed earlier this year that imposes harsh digital surveillance and limits access to information online. SB 976 forces the online […]