Close this menu

NetChoice Victory: Court Permanently Blocks Ohio Social Media Verification Law

Second NetChoice permanent injunction reinforces that government cannot outsource censorship to online services, impose vague restrictions on free expression, or use “safety” as a blank check to infringe constitutional protections. We hope to work with policymakers on constitutional solutions to digital challenges.

Learn More Here

Latest News

NetChoice v. Ellison (Minnesota)

Minnesota’s SF 4097 is a clear attempt to pressure social media companies into curating and delivering speech in line with government preferences—a direct violation of the First Amendment. The law […]

NetChoice Sues Minnesota to Prevent Government from Pressuring Social Media

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. — Last night, NetChoice sued Minnesota over SF 4097 because this law is a direct assault on online freedom, creating a backdoor for the government to pressure social […]

NetChoice Amicus Brief to the Ninth Circuit in Epic Games v. Apple

NetChoice filed an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with the Computer & Communications Industry Association, arguing that the lower court’s injunction against Apple […]

Arkansas Doubles Down on Censorship, NetChoice Sues Again

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. — The Arkansas government lost to NetChoice in court for the clear censorship problems with its online ID-for-speech law in March. Instead of finding solutions that actually would […]

NetChoice v. Griffin (Arkansas, 2025)

In March 2025, the Arkansas government lost to NetChoice in court for the clear censorship problems with its online ID-for-speech law. Instead of finding solutions that actually would help families […]

View More

NetChoice has:

17

Ongoing lawsuits

2

Supreme Court victories

530

Testimonies across the U.S.

Members