As lawmakers around the country seek to expand government control of the internet, NetChoice has taken several states to court over new unconstitutional laws on online speech and business. NetChoice's Litigation Center works to ensure the rights of Americans and our world-leading tech industry are defended in the courts.
WASHINGTON—Today, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of NetChoice & CCIA’s core First Amendment arguments against Texas and Florida’s unconstitutional laws controlling online speech,…
Learn MoreThe Court clearly states: “If the legislature’s goal in passing Act 689 was to protect minors from materials or interactions that could harm them online, there is no evidence that the Act will…
Learn MoreSAN JOSE, Calif.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California again granted NetChoice’s request for a preliminary injunction in its entirety against California’s…
Learn MoreCOLUMBUS, Ohio—Today, NetChoice has a hearing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, where we will be asking the court to permanently halt Ohio’s Parental Notification by…
Learn MoreGULFPORT, Miss.—Today, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi halted Mississippi’s unconstitutional social media age verification law from going into effect while our…
Learn MoreATLANTA—On Sunday, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia halted Georgia’s unconstitutional INFORM Act amendments in its Act 564 from going into effect today while our…
Learn MoreWASHINGTON—Today, NetChoice launched an official litigation center to promote NetChoice’s principles in court of protecting free expression and free enterprise online and combatting government…
Learn More
NEW ORLEANS, La. — Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated NetChoice’s preliminary injunction against Mississippi’s age-verification law. Mississippi’s law conditions its citizens’ access to vast […]
The government shouldn’t be able to snoop through your online data just because you use digital services—especially without a warrant. Courts are stretching an old doctrine from the ’70s to […]
Today, NetChoice filed an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in support of Duke Energy in Duke Energy Carolinas v. NTE Carolinas II with Computer & Communications Industry Association, the […]
NetChoice filed an amicus brief supporting X Corp’s lawsuit against California’s AB 2655. Our brief explains that requiring websites to label and remove political speech violates the First Amendment. The […]
NetChoice, Chamber of Progress and TechNet filed a brief asking the Washington Supreme Court to accept Meta’s appeal about the State’s political advertising law. Our brief generally makes the following […]
NetChoice submitted an amicus brief urging the Vermont Supreme Court to take account of the unique features of websites when crafting a rule for specific personal jurisdiction. NetChoice argued that […]
NetChoice filed an amicus brief supporting TikTok in the Iowa Supreme Court. The brief urges the Court to be cautious when developing new law around personal jurisdiction for websites.
The undersigned organizations write to express our opposition to the proposed amendments to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29. Collectively, our associations are concerned that the proposed amendments will infringe […]
